Category Archives: Interviews

An Interview with Marc Schuster

What inspired you to write The Singular Exploits of Wonder Mom and Super Girl?

I was working on a paper in graduate school when I started reading a pair of books called The Steel Drug and Cocaine Changes. As the titles suggest, they were about cocaine, and they included case studies of people who had used and abused cocaine. Some of them were very compelling, but due to the nature of the books, the stories were also very fragmentary. With The Singular Exploits of Wonder Mom and Party Girl I wanted to flesh out some of the details in a fictionalized forum, to try to come up with a more fully imagined version of the scraps I had read and started to piece together.

Tell us about your blog, Small Press Reviews, and the appeal of reviewing the works of small presses.

I started Small Press Reviews in November of 2007 after sitting in on a discussion of small presses at a local writers’ conference. One of the speakers was an author named Curtis Smith. I bought his book The Species Crown and loved it. Between his talk and the book, I was sold on small presses. Part of the appeal is that I feel like small press readers and writers share a strong sense of community. I had lunch with a small press author named Christian TeBordo a few weeks ago, and though we’d never really met before—aside from running into each other once or twice when we both taught at Temple University—we found that we shared a common language, so to speak, as we dropped names of small presses we really admire like Featherproof and Atticus Books, as well as small press books we both enjoyed like The Universe in Miniature in Miniature by Patrick Somerville. Being part of the small press scene is a little bit like belonging to an exclusive club, but one that’s—ironically, I guess—open to anyone who’s interested in joining. All you need to do is read a few books and join the conversation.

What’s the premise of Don DeLillo, Jean Baudrillard, and the Consumer Conundrum? What is the “Consumer Conundrum” and how is it reflected in the works of DeLillo, an American novelist, and Baudrillard, a French social theorist?

The book basically looks at the problem of consumerism in the western world. Early in his career, Jean Baudrillard wrote a book called The System of Objects in which he argued that humans have surrounded themselves with commodities which no longer serve any real purpose other than to signal status. This observation in itself is nothing new, but Baudrillard’s argument was that by surrounding ourselves with objects, we’ve taken on the status of objects ourselves—that our sense of self-worth is bound up in the constellations of objects we arrange around ourselves as signs of value. This is a bit of an oversimplification of his argument, but the conundrum I talk about in the book is that of figuring out how to overcome the inertia of commodification, how to stop being objects and, instead, become subjects, become human again. Baudrillard offered a lot of commentary on this predicament over the course of his career and eventually decided that it really couldn’t be done. Don DeLillo, on the other hand offers a more hopeful view of our species’ potential to regain its humanity—through art, though language, through doubting the logic of accumulation that surrounds us. It’s been a long time since I wrote that book. I’m a little fuzzy on the details.

Is there a link between capitalism’s need for gain (profits, acquisition, expansion, accumulation) and an addict’s need for increased dosages just “to maintain”?  (“Wonder Mom” seemed to touch on this indirectly, albeit from the perspective of a Drug Morality Tale.  Audrey’s inevitable crash late in the novel and the global economic cataclysm aren’t too dissimilar.  Or am I reading too much into it?)

No, you’re not reading too much into at all! In fact, a part of me always hoped that readers would draw a similar parallel. Look at the publishing industry, for example. John B. Thompson wrote a book a couple of years ago called Merchants of Culture, and in it he talks about the publishing industry’s need to make 10% more money in any given year than they did in the previous year. That’s why you always see a glut of crappy, gimmicky books just before the holiday season. The publishers are gambling that people who don’t generally read might buy these books as gifts, that they’ll be good for a laugh or will look good on a shelf in someone’s house somewhere. Yet another reason, I suppose, to favor small presses over big conglomerates. The same thing, as you note, happens to Audrey as she continues to fall deeper and deeper into her addiction. She’s hollowing out her soul as she strives for that extra 10% that will help her keep her head above water, at least until she needs her next hit. I always had consumerism in mind when I was working on that book.

Between your novels, your blog, and your teaching, what’s your work schedule like?  Do you ever feel like one area is being neglected while you tend to another?

Hah! Yes! All the time! I teach five courses with an average enrollment of about twenty students each. On any given weekend, I’m grading between forty and sixty papers. I love teaching, but that much grading really takes a toll. Needless to say, I don’t get much time for writing during the school year, but I do try to squeeze it in here and there. On one hand, I wish I had more time to write, but I also wouldn’t want to give up teaching. Not just because of the steady paycheck and benefits, but because I really feel like I come alive in front of a classroom—sharing ideas with students, helping them learn to express their ideas and participate in the wider dialogue not just of academia but of culture at large. Even so, I frequently wish I had more time to write. And blogging? I liken it to punk rock. When I’m working on a novel or an essay or a short story, I’m obsessing over craft and getting the content and form of the piece just right, like Brian Wilson taking months to record “Good Vibrations.” But with blogging, it’s more like the Ramones recording their first album in a day. Get it done, and get it out there. Share it with the world, warts and all.

What projects are you working on these days?

My second novel comes out in May. It’s called The Grievers. I should be getting galley copies this week, so I’ll be proofreading and making notes for any minor changes I want to make before it goes to print. Otherwise, I’m mainly gathering scraps in a notebook and hoping they eventually coalesce into something somewhere down the line.

Who are your favorite authors (novelists and/or academics)?

I like anyone who bridges the gap between “ivory tower” academic discourse and a more down to earth yet intelligent public discourse. There’s a lot in the news lately about the hollowing out of the middle class. I think there’s also been a gutting of the ability to have an intelligent conversation in the United States. At one end, there are academics who speak and write in impenetrable and, frankly, boring prose, and at the other end there’s the bombast and vitriol of the shouting heads on TV and radio, not to mention the histrionics of anyone involved in reality TV. It’s tough for regular people like you and me to have a thoughtful, intelligent, public conversation about the arts or culture or even politics anymore, but it is possible. Authors like Jonathan Lethem and Steve Almond do it in their nonfiction, and a lot of bloggers are doing it, too. Anyone who raises the bar on public discourse is okay in my book.

But if you’re looking for names, I love pretty much everything by Kurt Vonnegut. I was also on a George Saunders kick for a while, hot on the heels of a Chuck Palahniuk kick, a Neil Gaiman kick, and my perennial Philip K. Dick kick. Over the summer, I read Chistopher Moore’s Fool and told all of my friends to read it. More recently, I’ve been reading a lot of short stories. Robin Black’s If I Loved You, I Would Tell You This is amazing, and I really enjoyed Steve Almond’s God Bless America. I also liked Don DeLillo’s The Angel Esmerelda. If I’m not teaching or writing, I’m reading.

An Interview with David Schmahmann, author of The Double Life of Alfred Buber

Why is Alfred Buber an important character for modern readers?

Alfred Buber’s story is a riff off several things: isolation, male loneliness, a feeling some of us may have that for others life is richer, more sensual, more rewarding than it ever will be for us. Buber is frozen by that feeling, by the sense that he is a spectator at his own life, shut out of any chance at love, at being wanted, at feeling full and satisfied.

He mistakes these feelings, I think, for desire, and I believe many men do this: conflate loneliness with desire, as if connection with a woman, finding a woman, sexually bonding with a woman, will somehow end the emptiness. As Buber puts it, in men loneliness acquires a sexual tinge.

It’s Buber’s own story, of course, how his quest unfolds, but maybe in the crooked telling of it, the double lives and inadvertent lies, Buber reveals something universal: men’s desire for women is unyielding, relentless, and as often as not a proxy for much more complex needs.

As a lawyer practicing in Burma, what are some of the cases you’ve handled?

I first went to Burma to link up with a friend who had opened a Rangoon office for his law firm just after Aung San Suu Kyi was released from house arrest the first time. We had in mind to build a robust international practice and be prepared for what we thought would be an onslaught of foreign firms anxious to do business in an evolving, resource rich, and developing economy.

It was not to be. The government never did, really liberalize anything, despite grand sounding visions, nor take its boot off the neck of business, let alone its own people. As time passed companies left rather than came, or were forced to leave, western entrepreneurs vanished and were replaced by Chinese, Japanese and others, and it became clear that the obstacles to our building a viable practice were insurmountable.

What we did do, as American lawyers, was develop relationships with Burmese lawyers whom we trusted, and retain some very talented younger Burmese lawyers on staff, so that we would have been in a position to provide advice to international clients on the business environment, laws, and pathways to success. The firm to some extent continued to do this for a number of years, but I didn’t persevere, though I have warm feelings towards many people in Rangoon, and look back on the time I spent there with great fondness and nostalgia. (Well, I look back on just about everything with nostalgia. It’s the present I have problems with.)

In the movie Reversal of Fortune, Alan Dershowitz advises Claus von Bülow against telling his side of the story, since telling the truth would put the lawyer in an awkward position.  Does Alfred Buber’s truth telling place him at greater risk?

By the time he tells his story Buber no longer cares about risk, how he is regarded, or anything else, including his own life. He makes a commitment to tell his story accurately, and to do his penance by laying out his flaws and weaknesses for all to see. But in doing so he exposes more than he thinks he does because his story doesn’t add up, eventually reveals his illusions too, and how the track on which his thoughts run is not completely coincident with reality.

Of course being too honest puts one at risk whenever there are disputed versions of a single set of facts. Lawyers know this – memory is very shaky – but good lawyers are quite adept at sizing up how a client’s story – however honest or well intentioned – may be received.

And I would never disagree with Professor Dershowitz on anything law related anyway.

Many reviewers have likened the book to the writing of Vladimir Nabokov.  How do you deal with living in Nabokov’s shadow?

I love Lolita, and since there is some similarity in subject matter I’m not terribly surprised at the comparison, but I’m not a beneficiary of it. When a reviewer chooses to make the comparison between me and Nabokov, the enquiry then devolves to a single question: Am I as good as Nabokov, or am I not?  How could I possible come out ahead in such a contest?

I would say, in all bluntness, that my thinking, my story, my tone even, is meant to evoke J. Alfred Prufrock rather than Humbert Humbert. Those wonderful lines in Prufrock where he obsesses about the women he encounters in sedate London parlors, about how the fine hair on their arms catches his eye, about how they may see him, about how shallow their interests seem to be and how isolated and distressed he is, these are Buber’s themes. Buber’s default into what he thinks is desire – Nabokov’s territory – is just that: a default. His mind set, his dilemma, are not Humbert’s.

Buber is, like Prufrock, a perfect English gentleman. He certainly isn’t a pederast: he thinks of berating, in fact, the owner of a Bangkok bar for allowing a too-young girl to work there.

Have you ever been to Thailand?  If so, what were you impressions?

I went as a tourist many years ago, and then more recently when I had the opportunity to work in Burma I visited several times. I have also spent time in the north of the country, near the Burma border, visiting refugee camps and friends who work there, and I’m active with a group that supports Burmese refugees who live just inside the Thai border.

I came to know Bangkok quite well, and I have a great affection for many things there. There is something about the city that has overpowering charm: the Thais are as physically graceful as people get, in my view, have ways of behaving and thinking that are difficult for a casual visitor to access and are therefore endlessly interesting, and Bangkok is spotted with magnificent temples and statuary and stores filled with dusty treasures there for the finding. There is also a steamy, sensual undercurrent to it, a bluntness, a candor, that I admire.

Sex, women, desire, lust, the profane thread that suffuses everything but that is usually either denied or treated with adolescent titillation, is brazenly confronted in Bangkok. Personally, I find the image of a Bangkok bargirl trolling for fellatio customers less vulgar than Paris Hilton’s smile.

In a previous interview, you stated that the book came from a non-judgmental perspective.  How does this contrast with the place of judgment in law?

In law, the matter is always binary: one side wins, the other loses. Mature lawyers are often able to anticipate what the odds are of one or the other, and to find some appropriate middle ground on which to resolve differences. I’ve become quite good at that, in all immodesty, in sizing up disputes and trying to anticipate where the midpoint is, how it should end.

In my travels, in my books, I’m talking about something quite different. I’m by no means a moral relativist  – I believe in right and wrong, that there are some absolutes – but I have no patience for blue-stockings and self-righteous moralists. I don’t pass judgment on Alfred Buber, on men who behave as he does, or on Nok and women who make the choices she does, just as I have a very removed perspective on peoples’ private decisions: I care as much what color you paint your living room as I care about whom you have sex with (as long as you own the room, and the other person or people consent), and I don’t pass judgment on the kind of sex tourists who drift about in Buber, nor their licentious behavior. There are bigger problems in the world than carnal trading.

If anything I’m most acidic in the novel about the moralists who torment Buber in his own law firm, rather than about anything Buber himself may think or do.

What are your thoughts on how Americans view sexuality?

The question’s hard because it presupposes there is any one view. I’d start by saying, I suppose, that Buber is not really about sex at all but about male loneliness, personal alienation, a misguided journey by one man who seeks to find solace in sex when his desires have very little to do with sex itself. In the novel Buber makes clear that even as he sets out with fantasies of sensual escapades, no sooner does one actually present itself than he retreats into his old prissy persona, and promptly falls in love – not lust by any measure – with a young women who personifies for him the exact opposite of the raucous sexuality that surrounds him.

I think many people, perhaps the dominant culture too, trivialize sex, treat sexuality as a voyeuristic commercial oddity, reduce the sex act to a past-time, a punch line, a battle-station in some strange, unpleasant, jostling for dominance and relevance. As we retreat to our homes, our computer tables, our post-industrial, post-feminist, post information-age irrelevance, romantic love becomes tangled with isolation and computer-assisted fantasy, and a generation soaked in soulless high school hookups leads the way for sex to become as mundane as sweating.

I think we live in strange times.

Who are some of your favorite authors?

For many years I was an ardent fan of Lawrence Durrell (The Black Book; Tunc and Nunquam; The Alexander Quartet, and others) and of his friend Henry Miller. I still am. I reread and reread those books. I’m a huge Wodehouse fan, an admirer of Evelyn Waugh, Somerset Maugham, D.H. Lawrence, Nobokov …. An eclectic mix, in short. I also read an awful lot of non-fiction.

What other projects are you working on at the moment?

I have young children and a busy law practice, and those features tend to slow down my writing. It’s not a matter of time, so much, as it is mindset. I find that my best work happens when I retire from daily preoccupations and settle into my story without distraction.

I am though working on a novel I’ve tentatively called The Color of Skin.  Like my first novel, Empire Settings, it’s set in South Africa, and like Empire it concerns this issue of interracial love. But the story is much more visceral: about the modern consequences of the relatively simple, unacknowledged fact that the early Victorian explorers in south eastern Africa couldn’t keep their hands off the Zulu women.

How it came about, how it may have felt, how a descendant may deal with the mixed messages that have resulted from these relations over the years, makes for wonderful reading. I think it will make for a really compelling novel.

Interview with Author Mary Kennedy Eastham

West Coast author Mary Kennedy Eastham has been quite busy lately.  Her book of poetry, the Shadow of a Dog I Can’t Forget, was one of my first review copies I received.  I talked with her via an email interview.  Here is what she had to say about her recent projects, the art of writing, her love of dogs, and her favorite writers.

WHAT ARE SOME OF YOUR CREATIVE PROJECTS?

I am trying so hard to finish my novel NIGHT SURFING.  Writing a novel is very different from writing a short story or writing a poem.  There are so many more layers you must add to the whole.  I keep a Fragment File which is where I put story ideas, character traits, names I like, interesting snippets of conversations I’ve stumbled upon while pumping gas, standing in line at the grocery store, or at the bar waiting for a Take-Out order.  Oh, my, give a person a drink or two and they spill their guts!  They say the best writers steal.  I’ll add to that, nothing is lost on a writer.  It makes the world so much more interesting!  And I can actually say this: ‘I wish I had another life left to write even more!!!’  Although I probably wouldn’t be able to afford my health insurance!

About a week ago, I decided to take a break from my novel and start working on something new, a short story, “The Girl With Sand in Her Hair”, it’s almost writing itself.  This changing gears approach has taught me that when one thing isn’t working, you MUST start something new.  I am hoping to finish a first version of this story this week.  Beyond that, maybe this story can become the title for my second book, The Girl With Sand in Her Hair and Other Little Love Stories.  I’ve also been working on a long prose poem, “The Divorce Diarist”, for over a year.  A cinematographer I met recently wants to film a version of “Divorce Diarist” to post on YouTube.  That’s given me the incentive to finish the poem and start thinking about camera angles, flashpoints, where to film it.  Doing a mini-documentary was one of my 2011 writing goals, so I am very very excited about this project.

MY EXPERIENCE AS A CONTEST JUDGE…

To be a Judge frees you in a way as a writer.  You realize that  behind every Judge is a person, a person who is usually a writer or teacher or both, a person with writer’s styles and topics they are drawn to.  I have judged poetry, creative non-fiction, humour, memoirs, short stories and novels.  This year was my first experience judging e-books.  Wow, that was challenging, especially trying to read 150+ pages per entry online.  I closed down my laptop after a particularly long reading session and I swear for a few minutes, all I could see was a blurry cloud of jumbled words swirling in front of me.

The e-book competition asked its Judges what categories they wanted to Judge.  I put down Women’s Fiction and High School poetry.  The gave me Paranormal Romance and Fantasy.  Okay…but guess what?  I learned a very valuable lesson and it was this: a good story is a good story, no matter the genre.  I actually liked being in the otherworlds created by these very talented writers.  Near the end of the competition, they gave me the High School poetry entries to Judge, so the experience ended up being WIN/WIN.

My advice to all of you is to send your work out to a LOT of contests.  It will definitely increase your chances of being noticed.

WHAT WAS THE INSPIRATION FOR THE SHADOW OF A DOG I CAN’T FORGET?

Wow, Karl, you’re really making me work here!  Let’s see … I’d been writing for a while, and I simply wanted to get a book of mine out there in the world.  I took a class online with New York City writer M.J. Rose called BUZZ YOUR BOOK.  I used this experience as a challenge to complete a book.  My next decision was what to include.  That was a tough one.  But it helped me hone everything down to its purest.  Then I had to decide the order of stories and poems.  That took a while, a long while actually.  I knew what the very last piece would be because I loved the last line … the place where he last loved me …  Inspiration for me has turned into necessity.  I have to write.  I wouldn’t know what else to do.

The title of the book came from a poem of the same name.  I like its last line as well … as if he could tell me what follows love …

I think I’ve been questioning love for a long while now.  Like so many writers, moviemakers and poets before me, it’s a most fascinating, frustrating and forever after pursuit!

WHAT’S UP WITH MY FASCINATION WITH DOGS???

I think it was Thomas Jefferson who said we become one with what we surround ourselves with. I live in a house full of Golden Retrievers.  I’m a part-time breeder and there is always one or two or three or four dogs underfoot as I write, work-out, cook dinner, live my life.  I remember the wonderful writer Raymond Carver (Google his short story ‘Cathedral’ to read  this succinctly brilliant work of art) was an alcoholic for many of his early writing years.  When I would read one of his stories, he was primarily a short-story writer, at some point in the story the main character would open a beer or take a swig from a near empty vodka bottle or pour himself glass after glass of wine.  As a reader, you would almost get dizzy drunk reading Carver’s words.  When he quit drinking, Carver wrote a story about a man who was going back to a reunion at the prestigious university he graduated from.  Carver graduated from Stanford.  In the story, as Carver’s character sits down to be served drinks and dinner, he turns his wine glass upside down on the table.  Small, heartbreaking details like that one are my daily inspiration/motivation to get better and better at this craft we call writing.

WHO ARE MY FAVORITE WRITERS?

Karl, you always intimidate me with your own extensive reading list.  I like any writer who tells a good story.  I know that sounds so simplistic and if I could teach that skill to myself and get paid to teach novice writers that secret, I could retire to Paris!  I like being surprised in an O’Henry sort of way.  I like being whisked away to a world I know nothing about like the circus world Sarah Gruen creates in her novel Water for Elephants.  One of the first short stories I couldn’t put down was Michael Cunningham’s “White Angel”.  He went on to THE HOURS book and movie fame.  He also wrote the screenplay along with another fave writer of mine, Susan Minot, to the movie adapted from Minot’s book EVENING.  I love the poet Pablo Neruda.  Writer/political & social activist Simone De Beauvoir was one of my very earliest influences.  I like Lorrie Moore, I like the author of White Oleander whose name escapes me right now.  [It’s Janet Fitch.  – KW]  I like the vulnerable quirkiness of Annie Lamott.  I love Hemingway, Dorothy Parker, William S. Burroughs, Gabriel Garcia Marquez.  I just know I’m forgetting someone.

Oh, I like your mind and your writing, Karl, and I can’t wait for you to put a book out there into this crazy world. One more writer just popped into my head – Muriel Barbery – author of The Elegance of the Hedgehog.

WEST COAST LITERARY SCENE CRAZINESS…

That ANY of us continue to write at all in a Twitter/Facebook/YouTube obsessed world is a feat in and of itself. Sadly, most of the writer’s groups I belong to are online, so I don’t know how much insight I can shed on the California literary scene.  Writer/Filmmaker/Performance Artist Miranda July seems to have cut quite a fancy swath across this state with her book, No One Belongs Here More Than You, her films, Me and You and Everyone We Know (she directed and starred in the film) and The Future, a film debuting in New York and L.A. this week.  She also has a participatory website learningtoloveyoumore .  Google her.  She seems as quirky as the characters she writes about.  I’m a little, no, make that a LOT jealous of her genius in promoting herself and her work.

Dave Eggers, author of the memoir A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius, is a prominent San Francisco writer/ social activist who started 826 Valencia, a writing program for underprivileged kids in the city.  I believe there’s now a program in L.A. as well.  Dave’s own back story is quite interesting – Dad leaves mom and kids early on to basically become a drunk, Dad dies, then mom dies of cancer, leaving poor Dave to raise his younger brother Troph.  Again, I act like I know these people, I don’t, but they are I guess prominent California writers. Jennifer Egan, author of The Geek Squad lives in San Francisco and seems really lovely.  I asked if she would be my ‘friend’ on Facebook and she sent me a lovely response.  Karl, this question has made me realize I need to get out more!

WORDS FOR ASPIRING WRITERS…

I think I’ll end with my philosophy on writing: I really like my writing.  I believe in my writing. To be successful, you need to do your best every dayfor a really long time…

Thanks, Karl, this was fun!

Website: www.RP-author/MKE

 

 

 

 

 

Interview with author Chad Faries

Chad Faries is the author of The Book of Knowledge and his forthcoming memoir Drive Me Out of My Mind.  Chad’s Midwestern upbringing and international experiences give his poetry a unique perspective.  His brand of poetry possesses a singular combination of the humbly playful and historically engaged.  In the words of publisher Lisa Flowers, founder of Vulgar Marsala Press, “his work [is like ] a trip through Disney through the eyes of Woody Guthrie through the eyes of Ezra Pound, like an ever-overlapping pair of bifocals.”  Chad answered my questions I emailed to him.

What are some of your current projects?

It has been an eventful summer, but that likely is the wrong adjective.  My grandmother, the matriarch of my new memoir, Drive Me Out of My Mind, died a couple of days after the release in late June.  Then I had to drive across the country to Arizona to spend some time with my biological father who didn’t know I existed until about 15 years ago.  In those 15 years, we have spent about 5 days together.  Now, he is dying and I am with him, learning about him, and talking a lot about movies and women and it is wonderful.  He gave me a treasure of journals from his 70s exploits last night and I plan on doing something with them. I have also been working on a series of what I call Death Poems.  They are different than the tradition of death poems where one writes a poem on his/her death bed.  The Koreans had a strong tradition of this. I guess my poems are more direct ruminations on death.  The cliché is that indiscriminate readers say poems are always about death, so, there you go….Death Poems.  And of course some are completely antithetical and celebrate a life force.

What drew you to The Children’s Encyclopedia by Arthur Mee for The Book of Knowledge?

I had just finished my collection, The Border Will Be Soon, and those poems were written in a very heavy, war trodden, first person narrative.  The subject matter was based on my travels to the former Yugoslavia between 1995 and 2000.  It was so difficult to read those poems in public because of their immediacy.  Sometime in 2000, my father gave me an old copy of one of the original 1911 volumes.  When I read the titles of the entries—“The Wonderful Things That Happen When You Hurt Your Finger” and “Why It is Bad to Sleep With Flowers in Your Room”—poems started taking shape.  The diction in the book was freeing because the first person in those poems was really distanced from a first person that was closer to the actual voice of the author.  Plus, it was just so damn cool to look at and cradle in my hands.  It smelled wonderful.

How does the poetry in The Book of Knowledge relate to your memoir Drive Me Out of My Mind?

Autobiography and the play of innocence and experience are an integral part of both.  In both the poetry and the memoir, there is no “moral” to the stories because judgment is withheld.  There may be some moralizing, but that is likely done on a more emotional level—the emotions being created through tone and image, not necessarily through expository prose.

One section of The Book of Knowledge focuses on the history of the Iron Range in Michigan.  How does the practice of history relate to the creation of your poetry?

The way I see it, there is recorded history, and then there is this blossoming history that surrounds our every moment.  I like to posit autobiographical history into the context of a known and documented history.  For example, in the poem you refer to, some of the recorded history of the first settlers in Iron County Michigan are contrasted with the exploits of friends and family members from the region so that the histories blend into a single, inclusive narrative.  Also, the geological descriptions of the land of the land are metaphorically transferred to the actions of the characters.

How did your vision influence the overall design for the book?

I wanted the cover and every page to tell a visual story that also contextualized the somewhat awkward diction that peppers the book.  I wanted the design to be beautiful, yet disorienting.  Hopefully the reader might ask “Where am I? What are ducks doing at the bottom of this poem? Why don’t people design books like this anymore?”

In these days of political and economic upheaval, what can poetry offer the individual?

A deeper contemplation and an entirely new dimension that might make fear and mortality seem utterly absurd.

Who are some of your favorite authors and why?

I like Ezra Pound because of the way he collapses the personal and historical.  The Cantos does this over and over.  Pound drags us through the literary and cultural histories of the world, and then describes his cage, or tells us about the smell of a tent.  Marianne Moore is capable of this too.  She can encapsulate humanity into the scientific description of a spider.  Paul Celan has also been a favorite because he has his own emotional lexicon of lightness and darkness.  “He speaks truly who speaks in the shade.”  And then there are the two pillars of America poetry, Whitman and Dickinson.  One speaking in long, uncertain breaths, and the other in short, terse jabs.  That is what makes American poetry so dynamic.

Can a favorite author’s influence be detrimental or beneficial to the creative process?

It would only be detrimental if a writer didn’t make allowances for surprises.  The History of Iron County Michigan I mentioned above is an homage to Pound, but I am sure there are occasions in the poem where Pound would have taken out his pen, as he often did, and slashed entire lines.  This wasn’t his poem.  This was my poem.  If you lose your poem in your nod to a favorite author, the poem has failed.  And if the favorite author were to read that poem, he/she would tell you so.

Do you have any helpful tips or words of encouragement for aspiring writers out there?

Go find a flock of resting birds and run at them as fast as you can.  When they lift, keep running, but raise your head and track their assent until you lose sight of the horizon and all you see is bird and sky.  At that moment you will be flying too. Harness that sensation and translate it into a new language.

An Interview with Lisa Flowers, Founder of Vulgar Marsala Press

Can you explain why you named your press Vulgar Marsala?

We’re named for an image in DH Lawrence’s “Medlars and Sorb Apples”, from his seminal/groundbreaking collection “Birds, Beasts, and Flowers”.  I toyed with an assortment of names that encompassed a lot of literary and mythological and film references, etc, but ultimately this one stuck…more intuitively/impulsively than intellectually.  It’s an eye-catching name…maybe an amusingly misleading one, until you know what its axe is (some have even assumed it’s some kind of sex publication /site, what with the word “vulgar”).

What attracted you to the work of Chad Faries?

I’ve described his work as a trip through Disney through the eyes of Woody Guthrie through the eyes of Ezra Pound, like an ever-overlapping pair of bifocals … that pretty much sums it up!  The Book of Knowledge is an utterly brilliant concept.  Chad’s a distinctly American poet, in the Paterson sense, and a great chronicler of adolescence, of love, of heartbreak, of the landscape and how it shapes nostalgia.  His work’s witty, playful, profound, ingenious, and unexpected.

What is the creative mission of Vulgar Marsala?

Championing the work of unknown or little known artists is our highest priority … and will remain that way, whatever success we may or may not achieve … but aside from that, it’s pretty simple: we’re out to publish the most original and groundbreaking work we can.  I don’t mean simply “solid” “or good work, I mean stunningly visual and cinematically arresting work.  We have tendencies we like to encourage because you don’t much see them being encouraged: epic poetry of the Miltonesque form is like that … most journals, excepting the American Poetry Review and a handful of others, are not big on longer work … it’s often treated as a deal breaker.  Crucially, too, film for me is a passion almost equal to poetry, so I want the work we publish to be in glorious black and white and Technicolor … just as the site says.  We want work you can see, that you can splash around in, that you can reach through the screen and put your hands on … and maybe draw them back into realtime covered with exotic pollen or green slime … whatever.  It’s been said by so many artists over the years that in art that achieves its purpose, there needn’t be any distinction between mediums … cinema, visual art, music, poetry: all one, like a synesthesian Nabokov thing.  There’s this quote by the filmmaker Andrezj Zulawski … I can’t remember specifics, but it has to do with the definition of art … actual art … being no art.  It sounds pretentious and empty at first, but it’s actually trickily exact.  A true thing achieves itself both through and independent of form.  It has to be able to stand on its own no matter what.  We would seek to adhere to that philosophy … as we do to the adage about the first rule of anything being never to bore your readers/audience, etc.  To sum it up in a crude nutshell, I guess we simply want to publish stuff that doesn’t bore us.  We approach things from the POV of a child’s attention span … rather.

Why did you become a publisher?

See above.  Too, as a poet, I wanted an outlet for my own work.  And I want other writers I believe in to have an outlet for theirs.

Where do you see Vulgar Marsala five years from now?

Infinitely more evolved than it is now, certainly.  A relocation to NYC/Brooklyn is going to help immensely.  If we can get rolling along with some funding, and establish ourselves in a community honored through the ages for being one of the world’s most coveted homes for artists … in a city I love deeply and that has been incredibly responsive … I’m confident we can blossom into a humble if hopefully well regarded little outfit.

In what ways are you making Vulgar Marsala a financially viable entity?

Haha … well, uh, here’s where it gets tricky.  We’re essentially seeking to make it a viable financial entity by way of grants and the like.  Support is certainly not going to come from book sales.  All our expenses are out of pocket right now.  That’s why we’re “slow as the world” to quote Plath … though not also very patient, to paraphrase her.  But help is out there; you’ve just got to deliver something that’s worthy of it in the eyes of [grant] committees (etc) and individuals who might hopefully share your tastes.

Name some of your favorite authors and why you read them.

This could go on forever.  Roethke, certainly.  The great religious poets: Milton, Donne.  Epic poets like Hart Crane.  The godhead that’s Emily Dickinson … all of them present unique takes on interpretations of immortality.  Roethke, in particular, is one of the great poets of reincarnation, especially in Praise to the End! and the like.  Whitman has an exhaustible love for life and can show us how to live without fear; when I read him, I’m not afraid to die, which is something I can’t say for any other poet.  I like life-affirming work, even … and often especially … when it’s simultaneously nightmarish, and ingenuity and metaphorical wizardry win over the nightmare; poetry of ecstasy and joy, especially when it’s subverted into the bizarre.  Ditto for eroticism obscured in the ornate.  Obviously Lawrence in the aforementioned Birds/Beasts era, and Ted Hughes … who owes a great deal of his nature poetry to Lawrence.  Plath, of course.  Poets like James Wright can show us everything we could ever hope to know about beauty and sadness and loss.  At the same time, I don’t think doom ever need be unmitigated, and almost anything can be presented with humor, if the author is skillful enough.  I’m leaving a lot of people out, and I’ll kick myself for it, but that’s the jist.  Robert Graves, Anna Akhmatova, Rilke…etc.  John Ashbery is a huge influence on me personally; his labyrinths are endless, and he’s not afraid to go anywhere.  Figures like Henry Darger and his Vivian Girls chronicles can show us how to take a hazardous and technically unexplainable journey into the outer stratosphere.  Speaking of that, epics like Baum’s Oz series, etc … the most formative books of my life have been works of children’s literature … and adult literature masquerading as children’s literature, like the unabridged Grimms. Quantum physics: books like Brian Greene’s The Fabric of the Cosmos and The Elegant Universe have been as influential on my writing as any poet or novelist’s.

Speaking of novelists: Djuna Barnes’ Nightwood, which presents a dazzling picture of a rouged, pendant curled drag queen sitting up in bed amongst hidden chamber pots and discoursing on Rome burning through the night.  Alexander Theroux’s masterpiece Darconville’s Cat (one of Nightwood‘s lovers, along with Tristram Shandy) which presents a pitch-perfect satire and a brilliant range of poetry, children’s fiction, philosophy, and homicidal wrath.  Nabokov, as ever…Ada, which I mentioned, Speak, Memory, Pale Fire

What kind of editorial relationship do you have with authors?

A very open and unassuming one.  I trust them to edit their own work, though of course I proof everything obsessively.  Editing is a joint effort with a press this small, and I wouldn’t want it any other way, because I like to have complete control over my work and so do the authors/most writers.  But the more eyes the better.  You can never have too many proofreaders, no matter how good you are.

What challenges do you face as a small press?  What advantages do you have versus a larger mainstream press?

The main challenge is having zero initial resources.  With big … or even respectably established presses … you get your books designed and printed for you; you get your readings arranged by your publisher, you automatically make valuable connections … and friends … in the publishing world by way of association; you automatically get reviews…good or bad, etc.  We’ve gotta do all that ourselves.  This is a project of 24/7 hustling, and it’s from the ground up.  We have no agents, and we have no clout.  Of course, the same is basically true of every press (to a greater or lesser extent) that has gone on to become something: everyone needs to start somewhere.  It’s a learning experience.

How do you make your small press stand out in the crowded field of publishing?

By the originality of the work, ideally, in tandem with getting it out there. Scheduling readings, soliciting reviews.  But it’s got to be about giving someone something different and unexpected to look at, in terms of (again) the ingenuity of the work as a whole.  Anything else is false, just a publicity stunt.  And I love publicity stunts, theoretically … rock out with your cock out.  That’s how things get noticed/done.  But the intention and dedication have to be pure and virtuous and steadfast.  It’s just a matter of a lot of hard work.  And I can’t emphasize enough the importance of one’s fellows in promotion, etc.  Artists have to help each other, whether it’s “sharing” on Facebook or writing a review or making introductions …. nothing, no matter how run-of-the-mill, is inconsequential.  We can’t…and more importantly, shouldn’t … do it without each other.  I don’t believe in competition.  Actually, I find the whole notion of it to be offensive … you can be ambitious and driven without being competitive.  This is a community effort that should entail equal give and take.

Visit Vulgar Marsala Press at www.vulgarmarsalapress.com

and Lisa A Flowers’ blog at http://lisaaflowers.blogspot.com/

Interview with Martin Shepard, co-founder of the Permanent Press

The Permanent Press is a small publisher based in Sag Harbor, New York.  With high standards and a small staff, the Permanent Press possesses both the longevity and critical acclaim usually associated with larger publishers.  Martin and Judy Shepard approach the business of publishing with small print runs and putting out only a dozen new titles every year.  Unlike the mainstream conglomerates, the Permanent Press is more of an artisan than an agent of mass production.

Martin Shepard, co-founder of the Permanent Press

I had the opportunity to ask Martin Shepard, co-founder of Permanent Press, some questions about the book publishing business, genre, marketing, and cultivating relationships with emerging writers.

How did Permanent Press come about?  Did you do anything prior to becoming a publisher?

I had written 10 books (nine non-fiction and one novel), when one of my memoirs, A Psychiatrist’s Head (published by Peter Wyden and long out of print) drew a lot of fire from the New York State Medical Authorities.  It was an erotic memoir and the State accused me of either “holding the profession up to ridicule” or “violating the Hippocratic oath,” either of which would be grounds for revoking my medical license.  I thought both charges were ridiculous and “hypocritical,” and challenged the charges as a violation of free speech.  And I thought I could get the memoir republished in view of the notoriety these charges brought.  But when my other former publishers (Dell, Putnam, Crown, Penthouse) declined to do so, my wife Judith and I decided to set up our own imprint and republished it with a different title: Memoirs of a Defrocked Psychoanalyst. This was 31 years ago.  Before I became a writer, I practiced psychiatry, then designed and built homes in the Hamptons.  I was also a political activist, an anti-war democrat who set up the first Dump-Johnson organization in protest of the Vietnam War, called Citizens for Kennedy/Fulbright.

What is the relationship between Permanent Press and Second Chance Press?

Not content with one imprint we soon set up a second, Second Chance Press, dedicated to bringing back worthwhile books that were at least 20 years out-of-print.  We sent a letter to the Author’s Guild about it which was picked up by Thomas Lask who had a column in the New York Times Book Review entitled “End Pages.”  He wrote about this and we were sent 600 books, selected a half dozen to start, and were off and running.  In the last dozen or more years, all our books are original and come out under The Permanent Press imprint.

After reading six of your books, many could be classified as genre pieces (thrillers, mysteries, etc.).  How does Permanent Press approach genre, especially in terms of differentiating it from “mainstream fare”?

We never think about “genre” per se, and are just looking for artful writing in any category.  “Mainstream fare” indicates lowest common denominator, and we are looking for books that are valued for their writing, for “highstream fare.”

How do you cultivate relationships with your authors?

As a writer turned publisher I’m very sensitive to what a writer wants: a publisher who is instantly available, will always answer the phone and return calls, pay advances and royalties on time, invites the author to have input into cover design and flap copy, and makes clear what we can and can’t do.  We’ve formed many deep and lasting friendships with people we’ve published over the years and this is a very rewarding experience.  We think of the publishing process as a collaborative experience–a communal experience in many ways.

How do you market your books?  What makes Permanent Press different?

After a few years being distributed by others, we converted a barn on our property into a warehouse and began doing our own distribution.  We rarely let a book go out-of-print, believing if it was good enough to publish; it should be available as long as we live.  So while we usually only do a book a month, we have over 350 backlisted titles.  This is unique.  Also unique is that 98% of what we do is fiction.  As far as marketing is concerned we rely on reviews from Publishers Weekly, Kirkus , Booklist and Library Journal for sales, along with any print reviews (newspaper and magazine) that are still actively doing this.  For the past three years we’ve been very involved with bloggers who share an interest in quality fiction, which has been very helpful in spreading-the-word, which is all one can ask for.  We also have about 20 writers who get advance copies of everything we do for a fee of $90 a year.  We call this our “Word-of Mouth Club,” make no profit on this, but it does establish a community of writers helping fellow writers by telling others about novels they enjoy.

How has Permanent Press survived the ups and downs of the economy?  Are there lessons to be learned?  With large conglomerates cutting staff and going for the easy cash-in books, do small and indie presses have an advantage when it comes to earning reader loyalty?

What we do is sufficiently unique that we have actually thrived while the conglomerates continue to lose money.  Since 2007 we’ve had double-digit increases in book sales yearly and over the past three years, income from book sales alone is up 107%. It’s been very helpful in that the conglomerates are constantly looking for “Big Book,” while we are only looking for fiction that engages us.  We don’t need to hear the opinions of marketing or sales people as to what will sell.  Also, the six major corporate publishers who, through their more than 100 imprints, cover over 90% of the market, have increasingly decided that they are not interested in taking quality fiction by relatively unknown writers, so that writers and agents increasingly turn to us.  We’re happy if we can sell 1,500 copies or more.  That covers our costs.  The “biggies” won’t consider any submission where their marketing people can’t project sales of 10,000 copies minimally.  We currently receive over 5,000 queries and submission a year, so we have a lot to choose from–including authors who come back to us again and again.

Many of your books are small works.  Are there any plans or ambitions to produce larger works (say, over 450 pages) or have special features (slipcases, etc.)?

Ideally, we publish novels that range from 160 to 320 plus pages.  Since our print runs are relatively small, taking on a book of 400 pages is unlikely as the cost per copy of producing it is so high that we’d have to price it so highly that there would not be many sales for it.  Same goes for slip cases.  We try to do attractive covers but don’t want to enter the world of these very “artfully produced” and expensive books, believing that the most important thing is producing books where language, plot, mood, and style make the greatest impact of all.